One-dimensional bargaining with a general voting rule.dvi
نویسنده
چکیده
We study a model of multilateral bargaining over social outcomes represented by points in the unit interval. An acceptance or rejection of a proposal is determined by a voting rule as represented by a collection of decisive coalitions. The focus of the paper is on the asymptotic behavior of subgame perfect equilibria in stationary strategies as the discount factor goes to one. We show that, along any sequence of stationary subgame perfect equilibria, as the discount factor goes to one, the social acceptance set collapses to a point. This point, called the bargaining outcome, is independent of the sequence of equilibria and is uniquely determined by the set of players, the utility functions, the recognition probabilities, and the voting rule. The central result of the paper is a characterization of the bargaining outcome as a unique zero of the characteristic equation. JEL classification code: C78
منابع مشابه
Bargaining in committees as an extension of Nash's bargaining theory
This paper addresses the following issue: If a set of agents bargain on a set of feasible alternatives 'in the shadow' of a voting rule, that is, any agreement can be enforced if a 'winning coalition' supports it, what general agreements are likely to arise? In other words: What in uence can the voting rule used to settle (possibly nonunanimous) agreements have on the outcome of consensus? We m...
متن کاملBargaining , Voting and Value ∗
This paper addresses the following issue: If a set of agents bargain on a set of feasible alternatives ’under the shadow’ of a voting rule, that is, any agreement can be enforced if a ’winning coalition’ supports it, which general agreements are likely to arise? In other terms: Which is the influence that the voting rule used to settle agreements can project on the outcome? To give an answer we...
متن کاملA Bargaining Model of Collective Choice
We analyze sequential bargaining in general political and economic environments, where proposers are recognized according to a random recognition rule and a proposal is implemented if it passes under an arbitrary voting rule. We prove existence of stationary equilibria, upper hemicontinuity of equilibrium proposals in structural and preference parameters, and core equivalence under certain cond...
متن کاملDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Strategic Voting in a Jury Trial with Plea Bargaining
We study the criminal court process focusing on the interaction between plea bargaining and jury trials. We model plea bargaining such that a prosecutor makes a takeit-or-leave-it offer and a defendant, who is either guilty or innocent, pleads either guilty or not guilty. If the defendant pleads not guilty, the case goes to a jury trial, which follows a strategic voting model. Plea bargaining p...
متن کاملFeature Selection and Classification of Microarray Gene Expression Data of Ovarian Carcinoma Patients using Weighted Voting Support Vector Machine
We can reach by DNA microarray gene expression to such wealth of information with thousands of variables (genes). Analysis of this information can show genetic reasons of disease and tumor differences. In this study we try to reduce high-dimensional data by statistical method to select valuable genes with high impact as biomarkers and then classify ovarian tumor based on gene expression data of...
متن کامل